Nirma University Journal of Business and Management Studies
issue front
Citations
PlumX Metrics
Altmetric Attention Score
Dimension

Share Article

Parag Gupta1 and S. Subramanian1

First Published 23 Jul 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/XXXXYYYY261461373
Article Information
Corresponding Author:

Parag Gupta, Christ University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Email: parag.gupta@res.christuniversity.in

1Christ University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Abstract

The growing emphasis on sustainable industrial development has increased attention to integrating economic, environmental and social sustainability within manufacturing systems. In India, the Zero Defect Zero Effect (ZED) Certification Scheme was introduced to improve the quality standards and environmental performance of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). However, limited research has examined how the framework operationalises social sustainability within workplace settings. This study examines the social sustainability dimension of the ZED framework through qualitative field-based evidence collected from 92 manufacturing MSMEs in Haryana, including 46 ZED-certified and 46 non-certified firms. A matched comparative design was adopted to improve comparability across firms based on size, industrial classification and product similarity. Data were collected through field observations, open-ended interviews and handwritten field notes and analysed using a manual inductive thematic analysis. The findings indicate that while ZED certification contributes to stronger documentation systems, procedural awareness and visible safety compliance, deeper workplace practices relating to labour welfare, safety enforcement, working conditions and contract labour accountability remain unevenly institutionalised. The study further benchmarks the ZED framework against international social sustainability frameworks and reporting systems, including ISO 26000, SA 8000, B Corp Certification, the ILO Better Work Programme and the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting framework. The comparison suggests that ZED lacks measurable social sustainability indicators and structured accountability mechanisms necessary for consistent workplace implementation. The findings indicate that the framework appears more effective in improving procedural compliance than in shaping deeper workplace practices. The study concludes by proposing policy reforms aimed at strengthening the social sustainability dimension of the ZED framework within MSME contexts.

Keywords

ZED Scheme, triple bottom line, MSMEs, social sustainability, qualitative analysis, worker welfare

References

Amrutha V., & Geetha S. (2019). A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119131

Au W. C., Stephens S., & Ahmed P. K. (2023). Relational HR practices in Malaysian SMES: An ethics of care perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 191(2), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551–023–05458–1

Awasthy R. (2015). Journey of doing quasi–ethnographic study in organizations. Vision the Journal of Business Perspective, 19(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262915593667

Bentley S. V. (2025). The application of a social identity approach to measure and mechanise the goals, practices, and outcomes of social sustainability. Social Sciences, 14(8), 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14080480

Blandino G., & Montagna F. (2025). Social sustainability in manufacturing: Where are we? International Journal of Production Research, 63(16), 6178–6201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2025.2464904

Chiarini A., & Vagnoni E. (2017). Differences in implementing corporate social responsibility through SA8000 and ISO 26000 standards. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm–12–2016–0170

De Almeida Barbosa Franco J., Franco A. Jr, Battistelle R. A. G., & Bezerra B. S. (2024). Dynamic capabilities: Unveiling key resources for environmental sustainability and economic sustainability, and corporate social responsibility towards sustainable development goals. Resources, 13(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13020022

De Carvalho G. D. G., De Resende L. M. M., Pontes J., De Carvalho H. G., & Betim L. M. (2021). Innovation and management in MSMEs: A literature review of highly cited papers. Sage Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211052555

Dewi M. S., Ghalib S., Said L. R., & Sopiana Y. (2025). From structure to strategy: How organization design influences innovation and performance in micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6055

Durand R., Hawn O., & Ioannou I. (2017). Willing and able: A general model of organizational responses to normative pressures. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0107

Elkington J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st?century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106

Elo S., & Kyngäs H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2648.2007.04569.x

El–Said O., Aziz H., Mirzaei M., & Smith M. (2022). Mapping corporate social responsibility practices at the international level: Systematic review and content analysis approach. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 803–825. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj–08–2021–0332

Firescu V., & Filip D. (2025). Human factors and ergonomics in sustainable manufacturing systems: A pathway to enhanced performance and wellbeing. Machines, 13(7), 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070595

Firmansyah H., Gunarto M., & Andriyansah A. (2024). Synergy of occupational safety and work environment to support productivity and sustainable well–being in the port sector. Society, 12(2), 859–882. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v12i2.716

Gamberini L., & Pluchino P. (2024). Industry 5.0: A comprehensive insight into the future of work, social sustainability, sustainable development, and career. Australian Journal of Career Development, 33(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241231118

Gonçalves H., Magalhães V. S. M., Ferreira L. M. D. F., & Arantes A. (2024). Overcoming barriers to sustainable supply chain management in small and medium–sized enterprises: A multi–criteria decision–making approach. Sustainability, 16(2), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020506

Graham M., Woodcock J., Heeks R., Mungai P., Van Belle J., Du Toit D., Fredman S., Osiki A., Van Der Spuy A., & Silberman S. M. (2020). The Fairwork Foundation: Strategies for improving platform work in a global context. Geoforum, 112, 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.023

Hammer A., Keles J. Y., & Olsen W. (2022). Working lives in India: Current insights and future directions. Work Employment and Society, 36(6), 1139–1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221083511

Hofstad H. (2023). Well understood? A literature study defining and operationalising community social sustainability. Local Environment, 28(9), 1193–1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2023.2195620

Johanes M., Mark M., & Steven J. (2022). A global review of implementation of occupational safety and health management systems for the period 1970–2020. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(2), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2083811

Kumari A., & Singh M. P. (2024). The dharma of work: Cracking the code to social sustainability puzzle for the future of human resources. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 2047–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3213

Lall A. (2023). The cost of hidden histories: Critical perspectives on qualitative methods. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 8(11), 3360–3667. https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i11.021

Mani V., Jabbour C. J. C., & Mani K. T. (2020). Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107656

Martinez F. (2025). Drifting ideals: Sustainability labels and the syncretic ethics of certification. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70447

Mies A., & Gold S. (2021). Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128960

Montesano F. S., Biermann F., Kalfagianni A., & Vijge M. J. (2023). Greening labour? The role of the SDGs in fostering sustainability integration within trade unions. Globalizations, 21(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2234174

Nautiyal S., Rai S. K., & Joshi S. (2025). Barriers to greening the Indian MSMEs sector: A path toward sustainable industrial transformation. Sustainable Development, 34(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70255

Pearson H., Myall M., Darlington A., & Gibson F. (2025). The approach and application of analysing inductive and deductive datasets: A worked example using reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(4), 842–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2025.2499265

Pham M. T., & Srivastava P. P. (2024). Local economic governance and formalisation of micro and small firms: A gender perspective. Regional Studies Regional Science, 11(1), 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2024.2427197

Rector M. E., Filgueira R., Bailey M., Walker T. R., & Grant J. (2022). Sustainability outcomes of aquaculture eco–certification: Challenges and opportunities. Reviews in Aquaculture, 15(2), 840–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12763

Sharma A., Garg S., & Arora P. (2026b). Occupational health, safety, and welfare of workers in small and medium enterprises: A case study of steel industries in Bhiwadi, Rajasthan. Work. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261421914

Singh J., Das D. K., Abhishek K., & Kukreja P. (2019). Factors influencing the decision to hire contract labour by Indian manufacturing firms. Oxford Development Studies, 47(4), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2019.1624705

Sun H., & Cheng T. (2002). Comparing reasons, practices and effects of ISO 9000 certification and TQM implementation in Norwegian SMEs and large firms. International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship, 20(4), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242602204003

Torres L., Ripa D., Jain A., Herrero J., & Leka S. (2023). The potential of responsible business to promote sustainable work: An analysis of CSR/ESG instruments. Safety Science, 164, 106151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106151

Wörner D., Letmathe N., Jovanovic M., & Friedli T. (2025). Structuring private sustainability governance: Combining rule–based and goal–based mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 203(3), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551–025–06024–7

Zafar I., Stojceska V., & Tassou S. (2023). Social sustainability assessments of industrial level solar energy: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, 113962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113962


Make a Submission Order a Print Copy